Leniency – The Polish Programme and the 'Semi-Formal' Harmonisation in the EU by the European Competition Network (2024)

Related Papers

SSRN Electronic Journal

Ways of Harmonising Polish Competition Law with the Competition Law of the EU

2014 •

Krystyna Kowalik-Banczyk

View PDF

SSRN Electronic Journal

A Note on 2015 Developments in Polish Competition Law: Is It Really a Drive towards the European Model?

2016 •

Anna Piszcz

View PDF

Market and Competition Law Review

Mind the Gap! ECN+ Directive Proposal on its Way to Eliminate Deficiencies of Regulation 1/2003: Polish Perspective

Agata Jurkowska-Gomulka

This article aims at answering the question whether the Commission’s proposal intended to empower Member States’ competition authorities to be more effective enforcers (ECN+ Directive) actually brings effective solutions to all weaknesses of Regulation 1/2003, which influenced an inefficient application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU in some Member States (among them Poland, which will be taken as a point of reference). The first part of the article constitutes a review upon the application of Regulation 1/2003 in Poland. Interestingly, the beginning of its enforcement coincides with the total period of application of EU law in Poland, since the country joined the EU on the same day the Regulation entered into force. The problem with Regulation 1/2003 is that it does not seem to enhance the enforcement of the Community’s competition rules by national enforcers, including NCAs and courts. The reason for this failure lies inter alia in the deficiencies of the principles adopted in the R...

View PDF

SSRN Electronic Journal

Solvents to the Rescue – A Historical Outline of the Impact of EU Law on the Application of Polish Competition Law by Polish Courts

2010 •

dawid miasik

View PDF

Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies

Cumulative Enforcement of European and National Competition Law and the Ne Bis In Idem Principle Case Comment to the Judgement of EU Court of Justice of 3 April 2019 Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (Case C-617/17)

2019 •

Mario Libertini

The judgement of EU Court of Justice in response to the request for a preliminary ruling by the Polish Supreme Court confirms that the principle of ne bis in idem, enshrined in Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as not precluding a national competition authority from fining an undertaking in a single decision for an infringement of national competition law and for an infringement of Article 82 EC (now Article 102 TFEU). In that regard it can be concluded that the judgement does not have anything new and is just a confirmation of settled case-law. Unfortunately, this case represents a lost opportunity to review the ‘double barrier’ doctrine and to clarify if the relationship between European and national competition law is one of ‘bilateral specialty’ or not.

View PDF

Effectiveness of EU Directives in National Courts – Judicial Dialogue Continues: The Court of Justice's Judgment in C-545/17 Pawlak

2020 •

Monika Szwarc

This commentary on the Court of Justice's ruling in the Pawlak case concentrates on questions of the judicial application of EU law, in particular EU Directives. On the basis of the recent jurisprudence of the Court the authors present three issues: 1) the incidental effects of EU law for the procedural provisions of Member States; 2) the inability to rely on an EU directive by a member state's authority in order to exclude the application of national provisions which are contrary to a directive; 3) the limits of the duty to interpret national law in conformity with EU law from the perspective of the Court of Justice and the referring court. Further, the article presents the judicial practice of the Polish Supreme Court, and in particular the follow-up decision of this Court not only taking into the account the ruling of the ECJ but also showing how the limitation of a conforming interpretation can be overcome in order to give full effect to EU law. In the authors' view,...

View PDF

On Convergence with Hiccups. Recent Amendments to Poland's Competition Law

2015 •

Marek Martyniszyn, Maciej Bernatt

January 2015 marks entry into force of the 2014 Amendment Act, reforming Poland’s competition law. This article outlines the main changes and analyses in detail four of them: fines for individuals, leniency plus, settlements, and changes to the Authority’s inspection powers. It addresses the question to what extent the reform achieves its aim of increasing the effectiveness of enforcement.

View PDF

Studia Iuridica

Europeanisation of Polish Law Following Poland’s Accession to the European Union

2017 •

Robert Grzeszczak

The article concerns primarily the effects of the membership of the European Union on national (Polish) law and, to a limited extent, on the political system of a state. The conclusions presented in the article are of universal value. Although the article deals with Polish affairs, the principles, tendencies and consequences identified are typical of the relationship state – the EU, both before and after accession, regardless of the state concerned. It should be, however, noted that the path to membership and the membership itself are different in each case. The practice of the Polish membership of the European Union, its systemic dimension and the changes in the national legal system (Europeanisation) do not differ significantly than in the case of other Member States. Europeanisation of Polish law, politics, economy, culture and society has been in progress since the 1990s. One can differentiate between two stages of Europeanisation: before and after Poland’s EU accession, each ch...

View PDF


Giacomo Di Federico

This brief essay reviews the changes introduced in the Polish legal order and critically assess how the Commission has confronted the situation under the Communication of March 2014.

View PDF

Studia Prawnicze

The Consistency of Polish Competition Law with ICN Recommendations.pdf

2018 •

Mateusz Błachucki

The regulation of the merger notification obligation lies at the heart of the system of merger control. It defines what transactions are caught under the scrutiny of competition authorities, and which undertakings are obliged to notify them. The International Competition Network (ICN), which is a virtual network of competition authorities, has developed a series of recommendations for the proper construction of a merger notification obligation. The analysis presented here is limited to substantive provisions and the merger procedure itself is not covered by the paper The article aims to confront the ICN Recommendations and the Polish regulations. It will identify areas of compatibility and discrepancy between the two sets of norms The conclusions may serve as a basis for further development and the fine-tuning of the Polish merger control system. The analysis will also contribute to scholarship on the influence of transgovernmental networks on domestic legal order and the administrative practice of public authorities.

View PDF
Leniency – The Polish Programme and the 'Semi-Formal' Harmonisation in the EU by the European Competition Network (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Mr. See Jast

Last Updated:

Views: 5786

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (55 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Mr. See Jast

Birthday: 1999-07-30

Address: 8409 Megan Mountain, New Mathew, MT 44997-8193

Phone: +5023589614038

Job: Chief Executive

Hobby: Leather crafting, Flag Football, Candle making, Flying, Poi, Gunsmithing, Swimming

Introduction: My name is Mr. See Jast, I am a open, jolly, gorgeous, courageous, inexpensive, friendly, homely person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.